>
>
>
> I am not suggesting to host the control in a web browser, just to host an
> html page in a window.
>
>
>
> The performance would be within 10's of ms to that of a simple winforms app.
>
>
>
> Obviously the above two points would be irrelevant to the end user of such
> as system, as there would be no reason to build a system that had such
> suggested limitations. The end user would just expect things to work.
>
>
>
> HTML is undeniably the most ubiquitous form of delivering rich visual
> content(# of native applications vs. # of websites) My grandmother has
> actually built websites in HTML, which leaves me to believe that it is
> fairly straight forward to learn and can be created using notepad and
> debugged in your favorite browser.
>
>
>
> I can see how this might seem unnecessary, etc.. to those not familiar with
> the technologies.
>
>
>
> Don't get me wrong, I'm a huge fan of WPF(especially combined with MVVM)- it
> is what MM uses.
>
>
>
> I'm really not concerned with monetizing MM at present.
>
>
>
>
>
> Let me filter my audience criteria::
>
>
>
> I am trying to see if there is anyone who might fall with the following
> scenarios::
>
>
>
> 1) OEM's or integrators here that could make use of HTML technology in
> lieu of Mach3 with custom screens
>
> 2) Hobbyists who are proficient in basic formatting HTML and would like
> to create their own custom interfaces without needing to write any code
>
> 3) Hobbyists who want to create their own interface that have no
> knowledge of HTML, but can use a free website designer to build a custom
> interface
>
> (see
http://netobjects.com/html/essentials.html)
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> If you fall into any of these categories or you have knowledgeable
> constructive criticism to offer please let me know.
>
>
>
> -Brad Murry
>
>
>
> From:
DynoMotion@yahoogroups.com [mailto:
DynoMotion@yahoogroups.com] On
> Behalf Of himykabibble
> Sent: Saturday, January 21, 2012 1:36 PM
> To:
DynoMotion@yahoogroups.com
> Subject: [DynoMotion] Re: HTML CNC Controller
>
>
>
>
>
> Brad,
>
> No offense, but to me, that would come under the heading of "Just because
> you can do it, doesn't mean you should". My browsers crash on a regular
> basis, and using one as a machine control interface would scare me. Also, I
> would think there would be performance impact, no? Just seems like an
> unnecessary, and undesirable, extra layer.
>
> Couldn't you get pretty much the same benefits using WPF? Isn't that what
> WPF is all about? Given that VC# Express is free, and the form designer is
> something almost anyone could master in fairly short order, that also seems
> to me a nice way to go, as long as all they're changing is the visuals.
>
> OTOH, you could them monetize MM by including ads, and requiring the user to
> watch a 30 second commercial before each machine run! :-)
>
> Well, back to work, plumbing the KFlop into my controller. I hope to have it
> up in a couple of hours....
>
> Regards,
> Ray L.
>